Standing Conference On Drug Abuse v Khan & Ors [1995] UKEAT 1088_95_2410 (24 October 1995)
Given the respondents' neutrality and the circumstances of the pre-booked holiday, the appeal against refusal to adjourn is allowed.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 1088_95_2410
- Parties
- Advocate for Appellants: Miss Caroline Bates; Solicitors for Appellants: Messrs Bindman & Partners; Chief Executive of Respondents: Mr Howard; Respondents: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Chairman's Review Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Hearing, Review of Tribunal Decision, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss Caroline Bates
Advocate for Appellants
Messrs Bindman & Partners
Solicitors for Appellants
Mr Howard
Chief Executive of Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Chairman's Review Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal Chairman erred in refusing to adjourn the hearing dates due to a pre-booked holiday of the respondent's Chief Executive
Ratio Decidendi
Given the respondents' neutrality and the circumstances of the pre-booked holiday, the appeal against refusal to adjourn is allowed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment