Security People Inc v Slatter [2009] DRS 7172 (03 August 2009)
The complainant owns a registered Community Trade Mark for 'DIGILOCK', which is not generic or in common parlance. The respondent registered and used the domain name 'digilocks.co.uk' with knowledge of the complainant's rights and with the intention to disrupt the complainant's business and divert customers, causing likely confusion. The registration is therefore abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2009] DRS 7172
- Parties
- Complainant: Security People Inc.; Respondent: Adrian Slatter
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Security People Inc.
Complainant
Adrian Slatter
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has enforceable rights in the mark 'DIGILOCK' similar to the domain name 'digilocks.co.uk'
- 2 Whether the registration and use of the domain name by the respondent constitutes abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant owns a registered Community Trade Mark for 'DIGILOCK', which is not generic or in common parlance. The respondent registered and used the domain name 'digilocks.co.uk' with knowledge of the complainant's rights and with the intention to disrupt the complainant's business and divert customers, causing likely confusion. The registration is therefore abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
Orders
- The domain name 'digilocks.co.uk' is to be transferred to Security People Inc.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment