Intu IP Limited v Agency (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18067 (15 November 2016)

Intu IP Limited v Agency (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18067 (15 November 2016)

The panel found insufficient evidence to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, and therefore no action was taken.

Citation
[2016] DRS 18067
Parties
Complainant: Intu IP Limited; Respondent: Agency
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
no action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Intu IP Limited

Complainant

Agency

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found insufficient evidence to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, and therefore no action was taken.

Court Disposition

no action