Autowest Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 446 (TC) (05 July 2011)
AW and AH failed to discharge the burden of proof to show that the vehicles were privately owned and used exclusively for private purposes. The evidence, including AH's prior admissions and lack of corroborating documentation, supported HMRC's assessment that car and fuel benefits were provided and Class 1A NICs are due.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 446
- Parties
- Appellant: AH; Appellant: AW; Respondent: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- National Insurance Contributions, Car Benefit Charge, Car Fuel Benefit, Burden of Proof, Private Vs Business Use of Vehicles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AH
Appellant
AW
Appellant
HMRC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Class 1A National Insurance Contributions are due for car and fuel benefits provided to AH by AW between 2003 and 2009
- 2 Whether the vehicles in question were privately owned and used exclusively for private purposes or were company stock vehicles used for private benefit
- 3 Whether the burden of proof was discharged by AW and AH to show HMRC's assessment was incorrect
Ratio Decidendi
AW and AH failed to discharge the burden of proof to show that the vehicles were privately owned and used exclusively for private purposes. The evidence, including AH's prior admissions and lack of corroborating documentation, supported HMRC's assessment that car and fuel benefits were provided and Class 1A NICs are due.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The assessment of HMRC stands; Class 1A NICs are due for the relevant period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment