Mr MJ Morrison v Ahmad & Co Accountancy Ltd: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2401316/2017 (28 April 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of age and sexual orientation/transexualism, and had made an unlawful deduction from wages.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2401316/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr MJ Morrison; Respondent: Ahmad & Co Accountancy Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 April 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transexualism, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Sexual Orientation Discrimination Transexualism Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr MJ Morrison

Claimant

Ahmad & Co Accountancy Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of age
2 Whether the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of sexual orientation and transexualism
3 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of age and sexual orientation/transexualism, and had made an unlawful deduction from wages.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to claimant
Respondent to pay unlawfully deducted wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.