Harrods Ltd v Fayed [2009] DRS 6783 (23 March 2009)
The expert found, on the balance of probabilities, that the complainant had rights in names similar to the domain name and that the respondent was a false identity created to frustrate the complainant's rights. The domain was used to exploit the complainant's goodwill and reputation for financial gain and to post grossly offensive content, constituting abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2009] DRS 6783
- Parties
- Complainant: Harrods Limited; Respondent: Ahmed Fayed
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Complaint / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Abusive Registration, Trade Mark Rights, Domain Name Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harrods Limited
Complainant
Ahmed Fayed
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Complaint / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration under the Nominet Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The expert found, on the balance of probabilities, that the complainant had rights in names similar to the domain name and that the respondent was a false identity created to frustrate the complainant's rights. The domain was used to exploit the complainant's goodwill and reputation for financial gain and to post grossly offensive content, constituting abusive registration.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to the complainant.
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name fayed.co.uk to Harrods Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment