Mr N Chamberlain v Aim Recruitment (UK) Ltd and Mr Elliot Andrew: (England and Wales : Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism) [2017] UKET 2601826/2016 (11 May 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and/or transexualism by the respondents, contrary to the Equality Act 2010.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2601826/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mr N Chamberlain; Respondent: Aim Recruitment (UK) Ltd; Respondent: Mr Elliot Andrew
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 11 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transexualism, Workplace Discrimination

Employment Law Equality Law Sexual Orientation Discrimination Transexualism Workplace Discrimination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr N Chamberlain

Claimant

Aim Recruitment (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Mr Elliot Andrew

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and/or transexualism

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and/or transexualism by the respondents, contrary to the Equality Act 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondents found liable for discrimination
Remedy to be determined in a subsequent hearing if not agreed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.