Babette Wasserman Ltd v Aimpro UK Ltd [2007] DRS 4291 (2 February 2007)
The complainant established rights in the name Babette Wasserman through trade mark registration and business use. The respondent's registration and use of the domain names was found to be abusive, as it blocked the complainant's ability to register the names, confused customers, and sought to profit from the complainant's reputation. The respondent's failure to respond allowed adverse inferences to be drawn.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4291
- Parties
- Complainant: Babette Wasserman Ltd; Respondent: Aimpro UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Rights, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Babette Wasserman Ltd
Complainant
Aimpro UK Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the disputed domain names
- 2 Whether the domain names are, in the hands of the respondent, abusive registrations
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name Babette Wasserman through trade mark registration and business use. The respondent's registration and use of the domain names was found to be abusive, as it blocked the complainant's ability to register the names, confused customers, and sought to profit from the complainant's reputation. The respondent's failure to respond allowed adverse inferences to be drawn.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- Transfer of the domain names babette-wasserman.co.uk and babettewasserman.co.uk to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment