Alan Doyle v IC (Dismissed Environmental Information Regulations 2004) [2016] UKFTT 2015_0173 (GRC) (24 March 2016)

The Tribunal found that the Information Commissioner correctly applied the relevant exemptions under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 and that the public interest did not require disclosure.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2016] UKFTT 2015_0173 (GRC)
Parties: Applicant: Alan Doyle; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 24 March 2016
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Environmental Information Regulations 2004, Freedom of Information

Environmental Law Information Law Environmental Information Regulations 2004 Freedom of Information

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Alan Doyle

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Information Commissioner correctly applied the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 in refusing disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.