Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Alan Olner (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18665 (24 May 2017)
The panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The complainant is entitled to a transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 18665
- Parties
- Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: Alan Olner
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Complainant
Alan Olner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The complainant is entitled to a transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to Jaguar Land Rover Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment