Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Company undertaking construction work; VAT assessment; hardship application; company made advances to related entities/persons; hardship denied) [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC) (13 March 2026)

Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Company undertaking construction work; VAT assessment; hardship application; company made advances to related entities/persons; hardship denied) [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC) (13 March 2026)

The appellant's inability to pay the disputed VAT was the result of voluntary actions to divest itself of funds after learning of the payment requirement, with the intention of creating the appearance of hardship. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant is the author of its own hardship.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] UKFTT 398
Parties
Appellant: Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 March 2026
Procedural Posture
VAT Hardship Application in Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Application Before Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.
Legal Topics
VAT Assessment, Hardship Application, Requirement to Pay Tax Before Appeal, Company Advances to Related Entities
Tax Law VAT Assessment Hardship Application Requirement to Pay Tax Before Appeal Company Advances to Related Entities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd

Appellant

The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Hardship Application in Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Application Before Substantive Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be permitted to proceed with its VAT appeal without paying or depositing the disputed tax on grounds of hardship

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's inability to pay the disputed VAT was the result of voluntary actions to divest itself of funds after learning of the payment requirement, with the intention of creating the appearance of hardship. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant is the author of its own hardship.

Court Disposition

Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.

Orders

  • The appellant's application to proceed with the appeal without paying or depositing the disputed VAT is refused.