Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Company undertaking construction work; VAT assessment; hardship application; company made advances to related entities/persons; hardship denied) [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC) (13 March 2026)
The appellant's inability to pay the VAT in dispute was the result of its own voluntary actions in returning funds to a related party and making advances to related companies after becoming aware of the payment requirement. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant has deliberately created its own...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Hardship Application (tax Appeal) / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Hardship Application Prior to Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Assessment, Hardship Application, Company Advances to Related Entities, Requirement to Pay Tax Before Appeal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Hardship Application (tax Appeal) / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Hardship Application Prior to Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be permitted to proceed with its VAT appeal without paying or depositing the tax at stake on grounds of hardship
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's inability to pay the VAT in dispute was the result of its own voluntary actions in returning funds to a related party and making advances to related companies after becoming aware of the payment requirement. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant has deliberately created its own impecuniosity to avoid the statutory requirement.
Court Disposition
Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.
Orders
- The appellant is not permitted to proceed with its appeal without paying or depositing the VAT assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment