Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Company undertaking construction work; VAT assessment; hardship application; company made advances to related entities/persons; hardship denied) [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC) (13 March 2026)

Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Company undertaking construction work; VAT assessment; hardship application; company made advances to related entities/persons; hardship denied) [2026] UKFTT 398 (TC) (13 March 2026)

The appellant's inability to pay the VAT in dispute was the result of its own voluntary actions in returning funds to a related party and making advances to related companies after becoming aware of the payment requirement. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant has deliberately created its own...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] UKFTT 398 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 March 2026
Procedural Posture
VAT Hardship Application (tax Appeal) / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Hardship Application Prior to Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.
Legal Topics
VAT Assessment, Hardship Application, Company Advances to Related Entities, Requirement to Pay Tax Before Appeal
Tax Law VAT Assessment Hardship Application Company Advances to Related Entities Requirement to Pay Tax Before Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alesen Direct Solutions Ltd

Appellant

The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Hardship Application (tax Appeal) / First Tier Tribunal Decision on Hardship Application Prior to Substantive Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be permitted to proceed with its VAT appeal without paying or depositing the tax at stake on grounds of hardship

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's inability to pay the VAT in dispute was the result of its own voluntary actions in returning funds to a related party and making advances to related companies after becoming aware of the payment requirement. Hardship relief is not available where the appellant has deliberately created its own impecuniosity to avoid the statutory requirement.

Court Disposition

Application for hardship refused; appeal may not proceed without payment or deposit of VAT in dispute.

Orders

  • The appellant is not permitted to proceed with its appeal without paying or depositing the VAT assessed.