Revell v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Assessment/self-assessment) [2016] UKFTT 97 (TC) (16 February 2016)
No valid notice to file a self-assessment return for 2008/2009 was served on the appellant, as HMRC failed to send the notice to his last known address. Consequently, the subsequent determination, enquiry, and closure notice were invalid, and the assessment to income tax for that year must be discharged.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 97
- Parties
- Appellant: Alexander Revell; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Final Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Self Assessment, Notice to File Return, Validity of Enquiry, Closure Notice, Taxes Management Act 1970
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Revell
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a valid notice to file a self-assessment return was served on the appellant under s 8 TMA 1970
- 2 Whether HMRC validly opened an enquiry and issued a closure notice under ss 9A and 28A TMA 1970
- 3 Whether the determination and assessment to income tax for 2008/2009 were valid
Ratio Decidendi
No valid notice to file a self-assessment return for 2008/2009 was served on the appellant, as HMRC failed to send the notice to his last known address. Consequently, the subsequent determination, enquiry, and closure notice were invalid, and the assessment to income tax for that year must be discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Assessment to income tax for 2008/2009 discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment