Professional Standards Authority Formerly CHRE v Alistair Maylum (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 20854 (28 March 2019)

Professional Standards Authority Formerly CHRE v Alistair Maylum (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 20854 (28 March 2019)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that the respondent lacked legitimate rights or interests in the domain name.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] DRS 20854
Parties
Complainant: Professional Standards Authority Formerly CHRE; Respondent: Alistair Maylum
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks Passing Off

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Professional Standards Authority Formerly CHRE

Complainant

Alistair Maylum

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the domain name infringes the complainant's rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has legitimate rights or interests in the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or that the respondent lacked legitimate rights or interests in the domain name.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action taken