C Webster v AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2024] UKET 6002311/2024 (27 November 2024)

C Webster v AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2024] UKET 6002311/2024 (27 November 2024)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to carry out a fair redundancy process, including inadequate consultation and lack of objective selection criteria, resulting in unfair dismissal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] UKET 6002311/2024
Parties
Claimant: C Webster; Respondent: AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
27 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
claim upheld
Legal Topics
Redundancy
Employment Law Redundancy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C Webster

Claimant

AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to carry out a fair redundancy process, including inadequate consultation and lack of objective selection criteria, resulting in unfair dismissal.

Court Disposition

claim upheld

Orders

  • respondent to pay compensation to claimant for unfair dismissal