C Webster v AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2024] UKET 6002311/2024 (27 November 2024)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to carry out a fair redundancy process, including inadequate consultation and lack of objective selection criteria, resulting in unfair dismissal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKET 6002311/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: C Webster; Respondent: AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy
Employment Law Redundancy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
C Webster
Claimant
AM Packaging (Mansfield) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to carry out a fair redundancy process, including inadequate consultation and lack of objective selection criteria, resulting in unfair dismissal.
Court Disposition
claim upheld
Orders
- respondent to pay compensation to claimant for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment