amazon.co.uk.ltd v Hurdus (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2011] UKEAT 0377_10_1002 (10 February 2011)
The Employment Tribunal erred by substituting its own view for that of the employer and failing to apply the correct legal test of reasonableness under section 98(4) ERA 1996; the employer's selection matrix and efforts to find alternative employment were within the range of reasonable responses, making the dismissal fair.
- Citation
- [2011] UKEAT 0377_10_1002
- Parties
- Appellant: Amazon.co.uk; Respondent: Mr Hurdus
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision reversed; finding of fair dismissal substituted.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Reasonableness of Dismissal, Selection Procedure, Alternative Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amazon.co.uk
Appellant
Mr Hurdus
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal for redundancy was unfair under section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the selection procedure and consideration of alternative employment were reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred by substituting its own view for that of the employer and failing to apply the correct legal test of reasonableness under section 98(4) ERA 1996; the employer's selection matrix and efforts to find alternative employment were within the range of reasonable responses, making the dismissal fair.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal decision reversed; finding of fair dismissal substituted.
Orders
- Finding of unfair dismissal set aside
- Finding of fair dismissal substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment