Awan v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Late filing penalties - reasonable excuse - whether fair and proportionate) [2024] UKFTT 891 (TC) (07 October 2024)
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for late filing as she failed to check her online account after opting for electronic communications and did not contact HMRC before the deadline. The penalties were correctly issued and proportionate, and there were no special circumstances justifying a reduction.
- Citation
- [2024] UKFTT 891 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Amber Awan; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Late Filing Penalties, Reasonable Excuse, Proportionality of Penalties, Self Assessment Tax Returns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amber Awan
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late filing of the tax return
- 2 Whether the penalties imposed were fair and proportionate
- 3 Whether HMRC's decision regarding special reduction was flawed
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for late filing as she failed to check her online account after opting for electronic communications and did not contact HMRC before the deadline. The penalties were correctly issued and proportionate, and there were no special circumstances justifying a reduction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The penalties imposed by HMRC are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment