Petmeds Limited v Amdega Brands Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 9189 (16 February 2011)

Petmeds Limited v Amdega Brands Ltd (Full Decision _No Action) [2011] DRS 9189 (16 February 2011)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9189
Parties
Complainant: Petmeds Limited; Respondent: Amdega Brands Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petmeds Limited

Complainant

Amdega Brands Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name