Mr S Rooney and Mr M Redmond v Amey plc and others: 3323618/2016 and (England and Wales : Time Off) [2017] UKET 3323620/2016 (28 February 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimants were or were not entitled to the time off claimed based on the interpretation of statutory provisions and the facts presented.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 3323620/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr S Rooney; Claimant: Mr M Redmond; Respondent: Amey plc; Respondent: others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text.
- Legal Topics
- Time Off, Employment Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr S Rooney
Claimant
Mr M Redmond
Claimant
Amey plc
Respondent
others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants were entitled to time off under employment law provisions
- 2 Whether the respondents breached employment rights regarding time off
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimants were or were not entitled to the time off claimed based on the interpretation of statutory provisions and the facts presented.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in provided text.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment