Amicus v GBS Tooling Ltd [2005] UKEAT 0100_05_1804 (18 April 2005)
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to consider mitigating circumstances, including steps taken by the employer prior to the crystallisation of redundancy proposals, when determining the seriousness of the breach and the length of the protected period. The Tribunal acted within its discretion in awarding a 70-day protective period instead of the maximum 90 days.
- Citation
- [2005] UKEAT 0100_05_1804
- Parties
- Appellant: Amicus; Respondent: GBS Tooling Limited (in administration)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Protective Award, Collective Consultation, Trade Union Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amicus
Appellant
GBS Tooling Limited (in administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in awarding a 70-day protective period instead of the maximum 90 days for breach of s188 TULRCA
- 2 Whether mitigating circumstances prior to the crystallisation of redundancy proposals can be considered in determining the seriousness of the breach
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to consider mitigating circumstances, including steps taken by the employer prior to the crystallisation of redundancy proposals, when determining the seriousness of the breach and the length of the protected period. The Tribunal acted within its discretion in awarding a 70-day protective period instead of the maximum 90 days.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Protective award of 70 days upheld
- Employer to pay compensation for the protected period to affected employees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment