Mohammed v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2018] UKFTT 472 (TC) (09 August 2018)
The Appellant provided no explanation for the delay in submitting appeals against the penalties, making it impossible for the Tribunal to determine a reasonable excuse or to apply the required legal tests. In all the circumstances, there was no justification for the delay, and the application to accept an out of time appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 472 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Amin Mohammed; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / Preliminary Issue—application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application to accept out of time appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Late Filing Penalties, Late Payment Penalties, Out of Time Appeals, Self Assessment Tax Returns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amin Mohammed
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / Preliminary Issue—application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant permission for an out of time appeal against penalties for late submission and payment of self-assessment tax returns
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant provided no explanation for the delay in submitting appeals against the penalties, making it impossible for the Tribunal to determine a reasonable excuse or to apply the required legal tests. In all the circumstances, there was no justification for the delay, and the application to accept an out of time appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application to accept out of time appeal refused.
Orders
- The application to accept an out of time appeal is dismissed.
- The Appellant may apply to set aside the decision within 28 days pursuant to rule 38 of the Tribunal Rules.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment