Pet Plan Ltd v Andrea Botocelli (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 14450 (31 July 2014)

Pet Plan Ltd v Andrea Botocelli (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 14450 (31 July 2014)

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] DRS 14450
Parties
Complainant: Pet Plan Ltd; Respondent: Andrea Botocelli
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pet Plan Ltd

Complainant

Andrea Botocelli

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the disputed domain name to Pet Plan Ltd