Parlux S.p.A v ANDREW CLELLAND (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17537 (21 July 2016)

Parlux S.p.A v ANDREW CLELLAND (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17537 (21 July 2016)

The panel found that the complainant established all elements required under the Policy, including bad faith registration and lack of legitimate interest by the respondent.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17537
Parties
Complainant: Parlux S.p. A; Respondent: Andrew Clelland
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Bad Faith Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Bad Faith Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Parlux S.p. A

Complainant

Andrew Clelland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered in bad faith
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant established all elements required under the Policy, including bad faith registration and lack of legitimate interest by the respondent.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.