Perrin v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 223 (TC) (26 February 2014)
The interest paid by Mr Perrin arose in the UK because the residence of the debtor (Mr Perrin) and the substantive origin of the funds for payment and enforcement were in the UK, outweighing the factors of jurisdiction and actual payment location in the Isle of Man. Therefore, Mr Perrin was required to deduct UK income tax at source under s874 ITA 2007.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 223 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew Colin Perrin; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Withholding Tax, Interest Payments, Source of Income, International Taxation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Colin Perrin
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interest paid by Mr Perrin to an Isle of Man recipient arose in the UK for the purposes of s874 ITA 2007 and required deduction of UK income tax at source.
Ratio Decidendi
The interest paid by Mr Perrin arose in the UK because the residence of the debtor (Mr Perrin) and the substantive origin of the funds for payment and enforcement were in the UK, outweighing the factors of jurisdiction and actual payment location in the Isle of Man. Therefore, Mr Perrin was required to deduct UK income tax at source under s874 ITA 2007.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr Perrin's appeal against the income tax assessments is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment