Sheffield College v Getz [2001] DRS 55 (13 December 2001)

Sheffield College v Getz [2001] DRS 55 (13 December 2001)

The complainant established common law rights in 'SheffCol' and the respondent's actions—attempting to sell the domain and diverting traffic—constituted use that took unfair advantage of and was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, amounting to abusive registration.

Citation
[2001] DRS 55
Parties
Complainant: The Sheffield College; Respondent: Andrew Getz
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld; domain transfer ordered.
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Sheffield College

Complainant

Andrew Getz

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'SheffCol' identical or similar to the disputed domain name
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established common law rights in 'SheffCol' and the respondent's actions—attempting to sell the domain and diverting traffic—constituted use that took unfair advantage of and was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, amounting to abusive registration.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld; domain transfer ordered.

Orders

  • The domain name sheffcol.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.