Northumbria Spirit Ltd v Andrew Haddon (Full Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 15178 (06 March 2015)

Northumbria Spirit Ltd v Andrew Haddon (Full Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 15178 (06 March 2015)

The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2015] DRS 15178
Parties
Complainant: Northumbria Spirit Ltd; Respondent: Andrew Haddon
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
06 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Northumbria Spirit Ltd

Complainant

Andrew Haddon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the disputed domain name is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action taken