Miss L Irving and Mrs C Mabbutt v Andrew Howell (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Redundancy : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2403556/2017 (13 October 2017)

The tribunal found the respondent breached contract terms, failed to pay redundancy, and violated Working Time Regulations, entitling claimants to compensation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2403556/2017
Parties: Claimant: Miss L Irving; Claimant: Mrs C Mabbutt; Respondent: Andrew Howell
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 13 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claims upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Redundancy, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Redundancy Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Miss L Irving

Claimant

Mrs C Mabbutt

Claimant

Andrew Howell

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached contract terms
2 Whether redundancy payments were due
3 Whether Working Time Regulations were violated

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found the respondent breached contract terms, failed to pay redundancy, and violated Working Time Regulations, entitling claimants to compensation.

Court Disposition

Claims upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay redundancy payments to claimants
Respondent to compensate claimants for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.