Mr J Billingham v Andrew Kettle and Robert Parker (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2600510/2017 (18 October 2017)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> Mr J Billingham v Andrew Kettle and Robert Parker (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2600510/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr J Billingham; Respondent: Andrew Kettle; Respondent: Robert Parker
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 18 October 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Mr J Billingham

Claimant

Andrew Kettle

Respondent

Robert Parker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.