Stephanie Bennett T/a Proof Scrutiny v Andrew Topping (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 14772 (08 January 2015)
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] DRS 14772
- Parties
- Complainant: Stephanie Bennett T/a Proof Scrutiny; Respondent: Andrew Topping
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Passing Off
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Stephanie Bennett T/a Proof Scrutiny
Complainant
Andrew Topping
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment