RAC Motoring Services v Andrey Shevchenko (Full Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15623 (11 September 2015)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was similar, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain was registered and used in bad faith.
- Citation
- [2015] DRS 15623
- Parties
- Complainant: RAC Motoring Services; Respondent: Andrey Shevchenko
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
RAC Motoring Services
Complainant
Andrey Shevchenko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was similar, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain was registered and used in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment