McCamley v Revenue and Customs (VAT - ZERO-RATING : Exports) [2016] UKFTT 701 (TC) (21 October 2016)
The appellant failed to obtain and keep the documentary evidence required by law to support zero-rating of exports. HMRC was not required to verify exports with customers. The assessment and penalties were appropriate as the statutory requirements were not met, regardless of the appellant's technical knowledge or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 701 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Angela McCamley; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- VAT ZERO RATING : Exports / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision on Appeal Against VAT Assessment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Zero Rating, Evidence of Export, Documentary Requirements, Assessment of VAT, Penalties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela McCamley
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT ZERO RATING : Exports / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision on Appeal Against VAT Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to zero-rate supplies as exports without documentary evidence of export
- 2 Whether HMRC was required to verify exports with customers
- 3 Whether assessment was appropriate where only a technical breach of regulations occurred
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to obtain and keep the documentary evidence required by law to support zero-rating of exports. HMRC was not required to verify exports with customers. The assessment and penalties were appropriate as the statutory requirements were not met, regardless of the appellant's technical knowledge or reliance on an accountant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- HMRC's VAT assessment and associated penalties upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment