Bravissimo -v- Gander [2004] DRS 1295_Appeal (27 February 2004)

Bravissimo -v- Gander [2004] DRS 1295_Appeal (27 February 2004)

The Panel held that the principles of res judicata apply to the Nominet DRS to protect the integrity and efficiency of the process. The re-filed complaint did not present exceptional grounds justifying a rehearing, as the new evidence could have been obtained earlier and did not meet the threshold for reconsideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Citation
[2004] DRS 1295
Parties
Complainant: Bravissimo Limited; Respondent: Anna Gander
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
27 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute Appeal / Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Abusive Registration, Re Filed Complaints, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bravissimo Limited

Complainant

Anna Gander

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute Appeal / Appeal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the principles of res judicata apply to administrative proceedings under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether new evidence justifies rehearing a previously decided complaint
  3. 3 Whether the re-filed complaint contains exceptional grounds for reconsideration

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel held that the principles of res judicata apply to the Nominet DRS to protect the integrity and efficiency of the process. The re-filed complaint did not present exceptional grounds justifying a rehearing, as the new evidence could have been obtained earlier and did not meet the threshold for reconsideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed