Bravissimo -v- Gander [2004] DRS 1295_Appeal (27 February 2004)
The Panel held that the principles of res judicata apply to the Nominet DRS to protect the integrity and efficiency of the process. The re-filed complaint did not present exceptional grounds justifying a rehearing, as the new evidence could have been obtained earlier and did not meet the threshold for reconsideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2004] DRS 1295
- Parties
- Complainant: Bravissimo Limited; Respondent: Anna Gander
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute Appeal / Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Abusive Registration, Re Filed Complaints, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bravissimo Limited
Complainant
Anna Gander
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute Appeal / Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principles of res judicata apply to administrative proceedings under the Nominet DRS Policy
- 2 Whether new evidence justifies rehearing a previously decided complaint
- 3 Whether the re-filed complaint contains exceptional grounds for reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel held that the principles of res judicata apply to the Nominet DRS to protect the integrity and efficiency of the process. The re-filed complaint did not present exceptional grounds justifying a rehearing, as the new evidence could have been obtained earlier and did not meet the threshold for reconsideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment