Cardiff Exhausts Ltd (t/a Longlife) -v- Another.com Ltd [2004] DRS 1863 (3 September 2004)

Cardiff Exhausts Ltd (t/a Longlife) -v- Another.com Ltd [2004] DRS 1863 (3 September 2004)

The complainant acquired contractual rights to the domain name by paying the agreed sum for its transfer, and the respondent's continued holding and use of the domain name after receipt of payment was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, constituting abusive registration.

Citation
[2004] DRS 1863
Parties
Complainant: Cardiff Exhausts Ltd (t/a Longlife); Respondent: Another.com Ltd (formerly D C Tech Ltd)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
03 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination Under Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service
Outcome
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Abusive Registration, Contractual Rights, Nominet DRS Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cardiff Exhausts Ltd (t/a Longlife)

Complainant

Another.com Ltd (formerly D C Tech Ltd)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination Under Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name identical or similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name, in the hands of the respondent, is an abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant acquired contractual rights to the domain name by paying the agreed sum for its transfer, and the respondent's continued holding and use of the domain name after receipt of payment was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights, constituting abusive registration.

Court Disposition

Domain name to be transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name longlife.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
  • The decision is to be communicated to the respondent at multiple addresses including those found in Companies House records and Nominet's records.