ANTELOPE TRANSPORT LIMITED v Revenue & Customs (Excise Duty and Wrongdoing Penalty - cigarettes hidden) [2024] UKFTT 307 (TC) (08 April 2024)
The Appellant, through its employee and under its control, held the excise goods at the duty point and was liable for excise duty and wrongdoing penalty. Strict liability applies regardless of knowledge or interest in the goods. No special circumstances or procedural flaws were established to reduce or overturn the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] UKFTT 307 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Antelope Transport Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Excise Duty and Wrongdoing Penalty Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty Assessment, Wrongdoing Penalty, Liability for Excise Goods, Duty Point Regulations, Forfeiture, EU Directive 2008/118/ec, Civil Penalties
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antelope Transport Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Excise Duty and Wrongdoing Penalty Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant is liable for excise duty under Regulation 13 of the HMDP Regulations
- 2 Whether the Appellant is liable for a wrongdoing penalty under Schedule 41 of the Finance Act 2008
- 3 Interpretation of 'holding' and 'making delivery' under EU and UK law
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant, through its employee and under its control, held the excise goods at the duty point and was liable for excise duty and wrongdoing penalty. Strict liability applies regardless of knowledge or interest in the goods. No special circumstances or procedural flaws were established to reduce or overturn the assessment or penalty.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Excise duty assessment of £680,221.00 upheld
- Wrongdoing penalty of £408,132.60 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment