Barkas v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 186 (TC) (13 March 2013)
Condition 6 did not prohibit the separate use or disposal of the dwelling; it only restricted the use of the commercial building. Practical effects or intentions do not amount to a legal prohibition. Therefore, Note 2(c) was satisfied and the VAT refund claim should be allowed.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 186 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Barkas; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (diy Builders Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Appeal Against HMRC Refusal of VAT Refund
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, DIY Builders Scheme, Residential Conversion, Planning Permission, Note 2(c) to Item 4, Group 5, Schedule 8 VATA 1994
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Barkas
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (diy Builders Scheme) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Appeal Against HMRC Refusal of VAT Refund
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether planning permission condition prohibited separate use or disposal of dwelling under Note 2(c) to Item 4, Group 5, Schedule 8 VATA 1994
- 2 Whether the dwelling was 'designed as a dwelling' for VAT refund purposes
Ratio Decidendi
Condition 6 did not prohibit the separate use or disposal of the dwelling; it only restricted the use of the commercial building. Practical effects or intentions do not amount to a legal prohibition. Therefore, Note 2(c) was satisfied and the VAT refund claim should be allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- HMRC's refusal of the VAT refund is set aside
- VAT refund claim under the DIY Builders Scheme is allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment