Carter & Anor v. Stakis Plc & Ors [2000] UKEAT 1016_99_2310 (23 October 2000)
There are arguable grounds for appeal on whether the Tribunal's procedure excluded relevant evidence and whether cumulative effects were properly considered; however, the Tribunal correctly applied the legal test for detriment and was not in error for addressing the issue as a preliminary matter.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 1016_99_2310
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Carter; Appellant: Samuel Carter; Respondent: Stakis PLC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed on two principal issues; other grounds dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Procedural Fairness, Detriment Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Carter
Appellant
Samuel Carter
Appellant
Stakis PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's procedure excluded relevant evidence on detriment
- 2 Whether the cumulative effect of incidents amounted to detriment under Race Relations Act 1976
Ratio Decidendi
There are arguable grounds for appeal on whether the Tribunal's procedure excluded relevant evidence and whether cumulative effects were properly considered; however, the Tribunal correctly applied the legal test for detriment and was not in error for addressing the issue as a preliminary matter.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed on two principal issues; other grounds dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal to proceed to full hearing before Employment Appeal Tribunal on two issues.
- Chairman's Notes on detriment issue to be requested and added to appeal file.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment