Fane v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 210 (TC) (25 March 2011)
The appellant failed to exercise reasonable care in completing his tax return by misunderstanding his payslip and not seeking clarification, thus the penalty was correctly imposed. HMRC's decision not to suspend the penalty was not flawed, as the error was a one-off event and no practical suspension condition could be set to prevent recurrence.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 210 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Fane; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Penalties, Careless Inaccuracy, Suspension of Penalty, Judicial Review Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Fane
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was careless in completing his 2008-2009 income tax return under Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007
- 2 Whether HMRC's decision not to suspend the penalty under paragraph 14 Schedule 24 Finance Act 2007 was flawed
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to exercise reasonable care in completing his tax return by misunderstanding his payslip and not seeking clarification, thus the penalty was correctly imposed. HMRC's decision not to suspend the penalty was not flawed, as the error was a one-off event and no practical suspension condition could be set to prevent recurrence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Penalty for careless inaccuracy for 2008-2009 upheld
- HMRC's refusal to suspend penalty upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment