Lorimer v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE : Other) [2016] UKFTT 315 (TC) (09 May 2016)
The Tribunal refused the application to admit the late appeal because there was no reasonable excuse for the delay; ill health was an ongoing condition and did not justify the inordinate delay; the statutory time limits for each decision were clear and not subject to discretionary extension; and there was no credible evidence to support non-receipt of the decision notices or to challenge the assessments. The prejudice to HMRC and the public interest in finality outweighed any potential prejudice to the applicant, especially as there was no reasonable prospect of the substantive appeal succeeding.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 315
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Lorimer; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Extend Time for Appeal (tax) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for permission to notify appeal out of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Late Appeal, Reasonable Excuse, Income Tax Assessments, VAT Assessments, Penalties, Tribunal Procedure, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Lorimer
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application to Extend Time for Appeal (tax) / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision on Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should grant permission to notify an appeal out of time against HMRC review conclusions for income tax and VAT assessments and penalties
- 2 Whether ill health constituted a reasonable excuse for the delay
- 3 Whether there was a single or multiple applicable time limits for the different tax decisions
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused the application to admit the late appeal because there was no reasonable excuse for the delay; ill health was an ongoing condition and did not justify the inordinate delay; the statutory time limits for each decision were clear and not subject to discretionary extension; and there was no credible evidence to support non-receipt of the decision notices or to challenge the assessments. The prejudice to HMRC and the public interest in finality outweighed any potential prejudice to the applicant, especially as there was no reasonable prospect of the substantive appeal succeeding.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to notify appeal out of time refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment