Nowosielski v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 212 (TC) (23 March 2012)
The appellant was entitled to tax relief on the interest paid to HSBC plc because Vanfame Limited and Andrew Pinchin Architects Limited were associated companies within the meaning of section 416, and the appellant had a material interest in Vanfame Limited as a loan creditor entitled to more than 5% of the assets on winding up, satisfying the requirements of section 360A(1)(b).
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 212 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Antoni Nowosielski; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Exemptions and Reliefs, Loan Interest Deduction, Associated Companies, Material Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antoni Nowosielski
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to tax relief on interest paid to HSBC plc for monies lent to Vanfame Limited under the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, considering the requirements of associated companies and material interest.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was entitled to tax relief on the interest paid to HSBC plc because Vanfame Limited and Andrew Pinchin Architects Limited were associated companies within the meaning of section 416, and the appellant had a material interest in Vanfame Limited as a loan creditor entitled to more than 5% of the assets on winding up, satisfying the requirements of section 360A(1)(b).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appellant is entitled to relief against the interest payments made by him to HSBC plc in respect of monies lent by him to Vanfame Limited.
- The amended assessments dated 01 February 2011 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment