SO31 LIMITED v ANY-Web Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 16688 (31 December 2015)

SO31 LIMITED v ANY-Web Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 16688 (31 December 2015)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an Abusive Registration under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16688
Parties
Complainant: SO31 LIMITED; Respondent: ANY-Web Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SO31 LIMITED

Complainant

ANY-Web Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name in dispute is an Abusive Registration under the DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an Abusive Registration under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name