Crown Prosecution Service v. Clarke [2001] UKEAT 1254_00_2003 (20 March 2001)
Permission to appeal is granted on grounds relating to comparator analysis, the finding regarding the nickname 'mad Mary', alleged speculation, and the use of evidence of organisational culture; other grounds are dismissed as not independently arguable.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1254_00_2003
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Partial grant of permission to appeal
- Legal Topics
- Discrimination, Grounds of Appeal, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in its approach to less favourable treatment
- 2 Whether the use of the nickname 'mad Mary' was discriminatory
- 3 Whether the Tribunal engaged in impermissible speculation
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on grounds relating to comparator analysis, the finding regarding the nickname 'mad Mary', alleged speculation, and the use of evidence of organisational culture; other grounds are dismissed as not independently arguable.
Court Disposition
Partial grant of permission to appeal
Orders
- Permission to proceed to full hearing on specified grounds
- Notice of Appeal to be redrawn to reflect permitted grounds
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment