Coomer v Artix Ltd [1996] UKEAT 1006_94_3101 (31 January 1996)
The appeal was dismissed as the Appellant did not wish to argue the sole ground, and his conduct in refusing settlement and pursuing the appeal was deemed vexatious, justifying an order for costs assessed at the amount in dispute.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 1006_94_3101
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondents: Artix Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; costs order made against Appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Costs, Adjournment, Ex Gratia Payment, Set Off
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Artix Ltd
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Respondents were entitled to set off an ex-gratia payment against two weeks' compensation for unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether Appellant's conduct warranted an order for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as the Appellant did not wish to argue the sole ground, and his conduct in refusing settlement and pursuing the appeal was deemed vexatious, justifying an order for costs assessed at the amount in dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; costs order made against Appellant.
Orders
- Appellant to pay Respondents £378.46 as assessed costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment