Roberts v. 4 Front Technologies Ltd [2001] UKEAT 601_01_3110 (31 October 2001)

Roberts v. 4 Front Technologies Ltd [2001] UKEAT 601_01_3110 (31 October 2001)

The Tribunal was arguably wrong in law in finding a genuine redundancy and in ignoring the absence of evidence of a proper consultation/selection process.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 601_01_3110
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Appellant's Solicitor: Ormerods Solicitors
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal arguable
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Consultation Process, Selection Process
Employment Law Redundancy Consultation Process Selection Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Ormerods Solicitors

Appellant's Solicitor

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a genuine redundancy
  2. 2 Whether there was evidence of a proper consultation/selection process for redundancy

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal was arguably wrong in law in finding a genuine redundancy and in ignoring the absence of evidence of a proper consultation/selection process.

Court Disposition

appeal arguable