Nnadi v. Brent, Kensington, Chelsea & Westminster Mental Health NHS Trust [2000] UKEAT 1477_99_3011 (30 November 2000)
There was no error of law in the Employment Tribunal's decision; the Tribunal was entitled to its findings on the evidence, properly considered comparators and protected acts, and no arguable point of law arises for appeal.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 1477_99_3011
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant (unnamed); Respondent: Respondents (unnamed)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Comparators, Protected Acts, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant (unnamed)
Appellant
Respondents (unnamed)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in its findings on race discrimination
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to apply correct legal principles regarding comparators and protected acts
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's findings were perverse or unsupported by evidence
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law in the Employment Tribunal's decision; the Tribunal was entitled to its findings on the evidence, properly considered comparators and protected acts, and no arguable point of law arises for appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage; leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment