Bangura v Southern Cross Healthcare Group Plc & Anor (Transfer of Undertakings : Transfer) [2013] UKEAT 0432_12_1203 (12 March 2013)
Employment was terminated by summary dismissal before the transfer and appeal was not resolved; therefore, liability did not transfer to the transferee under TUPE. No incompatibility exists between domestic law and the Directive; ordinary national law applies.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0432_12_1203
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent (Four Seasons Healthcare)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, TUPE Regulations, Unfair Dismissal, Employment Status, Racial Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
First Respondent
Respondent
Second Respondent (Four Seasons Healthcare)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a pending appeal against dismissal preserve employment status for TUPE transfer?
- 2 Does liability for unfair dismissal transfer to the transferee under TUPE when appeal is unresolved?
Ratio Decidendi
Employment was terminated by summary dismissal before the transfer and appeal was not resolved; therefore, liability did not transfer to the transferee under TUPE. No incompatibility exists between domestic law and the Directive; ordinary national law applies.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment