Allen v. Harrow [2001] UKEAT 854_00_3001 (30 January 2001)

Allen v. Harrow [2001] UKEAT 854_00_3001 (30 January 2001)

The tribunal considered both ad hoc and collective approaches to the complaints and was entitled to reach its decision; there was no misdirection in law or arguable point of law in the grounds of appeal.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 854_00_3001
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Local Authority
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
30 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Local Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the tribunal misdirected itself in law
  2. 2 whether the tribunal failed to properly separate conclusions on race and disability discrimination
  3. 3 whether duties to adjust workplace equipment are non-delegable

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal considered both ad hoc and collective approaches to the complaints and was entitled to reach its decision; there was no misdirection in law or arguable point of law in the grounds of appeal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed