Brice v. North Somerset Council [2000] UKEAT 942_00_0812 (8 December 2000)
The Chairman's decision to require a deposit was reasonable based on his findings that the complaint was unlikely to succeed; the appellate body cannot interfere with such a discretionary decision.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 942_00_0812
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: North Somerset Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertaking, Failure to Consult, Preliminary Deposit Order
Employment Law Transfer of Undertaking Failure to Consult Preliminary Deposit Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
North Somerset Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal Chairman's order requiring a deposit as a condition to proceed was reasonable
- 2 Whether the appellant's complaint had little chance of success
Ratio Decidendi
The Chairman's decision to require a deposit was reasonable based on his findings that the complaint was unlikely to succeed; the appellate body cannot interfere with such a discretionary decision.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage
- Deposit order of £75 stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment