IA144212021 [2023] UKAITUR IA144212021 (10 May 2023)

IA144212021 [2023] UKAITUR IA144212021 (10 May 2023)

The First-tier Tribunal Judge gave adequate, evidence-based reasons for rejecting the appellant's account, and the findings were neither irrational nor unreasonable; therefore, there was no error of law.

Citation
[2023] UKAITUR IA144212021
Parties
Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; First-tier Tribunal decision stands.
Legal Topics
Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Error of Law, Adequacy of Reasons
Immigration Law Asylum Credibility Assessment Error of Law Adequacy of Reasons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant

Appellant

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal Judge gave adequate reasons for rejecting the appellant's account
  2. 2 Whether the First-tier Tribunal Judge erred in law in assessing the credibility of the appellant's claim
  3. 3 Whether the appellant is at risk on return to Egypt from people connected to the alleged incident

Ratio Decidendi

The First-tier Tribunal Judge gave adequate, evidence-based reasons for rejecting the appellant's account, and the findings were neither irrational nor unreasonable; therefore, there was no error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; First-tier Tribunal decision stands.

Orders

  • The decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error on a point of law; the decision shall stand.