Cottis v. The Governors of Highcroft Junior School [2000] UKEAT 675_00_2911 (29 November 2000)
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to make the findings of fact it did, and there was no error of law or perversity in its decision to dismiss the Appellant's claims of constructive and unfair dismissal. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence and was justified in its conclusions regarding the Appellant's conduct and the resulting actions taken by the employer.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 675_00_2911
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure, Perversity, Child Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law or acted perversely in dismissing the Appellant's claim of constructive and unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether the findings of fact by the Employment Tribunal were perverse
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal misapplied the law regarding child abuse and wilfulness
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal was entitled to make the findings of fact it did, and there was no error of law or perversity in its decision to dismiss the Appellant's claims of constructive and unfair dismissal. The Tribunal properly considered the evidence and was justified in its conclusions regarding the Appellant's conduct and the resulting actions taken by the employer.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment