Cunningham v Oaklands College [2003] UKEAT 0437_03_0611 (6 November 2003)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider the Appellant's alternative case that the 2002 resignation was caused by a fresh fundamental breach by the employer. The Tribunal's failure to address this argument, which was clearly before it, justified allowing the appeal and remitting the case to a fresh Tribunal.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0437_03_0611
- Parties
- Appellant: Appellant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Implied Term of Trust and Confidence, Resignation, Remittal to Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Appellant
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to consider the Appellant's alternative case that the 2002 resignation was caused by a fresh fundamental breach by the employer
- 2 Whether the Appellant could rely on earlier breaches from 1999 for constructive dismissal in 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to consider the Appellant's alternative case that the 2002 resignation was caused by a fresh fundamental breach by the employer. The Tribunal's failure to address this argument, which was clearly before it, justified allowing the appeal and remitting the case to a fresh Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The case is remitted as a whole to a fresh Employment Tribunal for rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment